Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Healthy Aging

As the population of Southern Nevada ages, with those individuals 65+ the fastest growing segment of the population, healthy aging will become more important to our community.     

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Clark

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Population Over Age 65 (Count)

Current Value:
343,754
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark People 65+ Living Alone

Current Value:

County: Clark People 65+ Living Alone

24.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.6%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (24.3%), Clark has a value of 24.0% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(24.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.4%), Clark has a value of 24.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Current Value:
82,341
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
10.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 10.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.7%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 10.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (10.1%), Clark has a value of 10.3% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Clark has a value of 10.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Current Value:
34,995
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

31.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 31.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 30.1%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 31.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (37.9%), Clark has a value of 31.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

47.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 47.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 37.4%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 47.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 42.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 39.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), Clark has a value of 47.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:
11.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 11.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.2%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 11.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.4%), Clark has a value of 11.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:
34.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (34.0%), Clark has a value of 34.1%.
NV Value
(34.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Clark has a value of 34.1%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
13.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (14.3%), Clark has a value of 13.8%.
NV Value
(14.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Clark has a value of 13.8%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
8.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (7.5%), Clark has a value of 8.0%.
NV Value
(7.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Clark has a value of 8.0%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
6.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (6.6%), Clark has a value of 6.8%.
NV Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Clark has a value of 6.8%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

13.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (12.9%), Clark has a value of 13.4%.
NV Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Clark has a value of 13.4%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 5.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (5.0%), Clark has a value of 5.0%.
NV Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Clark has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (7.0%), Clark has a value of 7.0%.
NV Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Clark has a value of 7.0%.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:
12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (12.0%), Clark has a value of 12.0%.
NV Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Clark has a value of 12.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (12.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 11.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (10.0%), Clark has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Clark has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
19.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 19.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 19.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (17.0%), Clark has a value of 19.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Clark has a value of 19.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (19.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.0%).
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark COPD: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (11.0%), Clark has a value of 11.0%.
NV Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Clark has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Depression: Medicare Population

Current Value:
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 13.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (13.0%), Clark has a value of 13.0%.
NV Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Clark has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:
25.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 25.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (23.0%), Clark has a value of 25.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Clark has a value of 25.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (25.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.0%).
Prior Value
(25.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population

Current Value:
80.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 80.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 79.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 80.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,097 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (81.2%), Clark has a value of 80.7% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(81.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (87.5%), Clark has a value of 80.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (80.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (80.0%).
Prior Value
(80.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
39.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 39.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 29.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 18.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 39.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (41.0%), Clark has a value of 39.0% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(41.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Clark has a value of 39.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (39.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (38.0%).
Prior Value
(38.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (9.0%), Clark has a value of 10.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Clark has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (10.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
64.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 64.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 52.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 62.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 64.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (63.0%), Clark has a value of 64.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(63.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Clark has a value of 64.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (64.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (62.0%).
Prior Value
(62.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:
62.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 62.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 57.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 59.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 62.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (60.0%), Clark has a value of 62.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Clark has a value of 62.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (62.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (62.0%).
Prior Value
(62.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
20.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 20.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 20.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (18.0%), Clark has a value of 20.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Clark has a value of 20.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (20.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.0%).
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
34.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 34.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 32.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 24.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 34.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (38.0%), Clark has a value of 34.0% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(38.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Clark has a value of 34.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (34.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.0%).
Prior Value
(34.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Current Value:
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 10.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 10.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (10.0%), Clark has a value of 10.0%.
NV Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Clark has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (10.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 4.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 2.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (7.0%), Clark has a value of 6.0% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Clark has a value of 6.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (6.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (4.0%).
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

3,090.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 3,090.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,209.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2,703.0.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 3,090.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (2,788.0), Clark has a value of 3,090.0 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(2,788.0)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Clark has a value of 3,090.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (3,090.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3,030.0).
Prior Value
(3,030.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

32.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 32.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 29.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 32.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (31.0%), Clark has a value of 32.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(31.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Clark has a value of 32.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (32.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (31.0%).
Prior Value
(31.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (5.0%), Clark has a value of 6.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Clark has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.