Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Chronic Disease Indicators

This dashboard focuses on physical activity, nutrition, obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and tobacco/vaping. These indicators are used by the Southern Nevada Health District Chronic Disease Prevention Program to track and measure progress towards chronic disease prevention goals and objectives for Clark County.
 
Select a location using the drop-down list below. Click on an indicator to navigate to the indicator detail page where you can learn more about the indicator. 
 
Learn more about our programs and the Get Healthy Initiative by visiting the interactive website created just for Clark County residents called www.gethealthyclarkcounty.org (o en español en www.vivasaludable.org).

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Clark

Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education

Current Value:
15.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (15.9%), Clark has a value of 15.1% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (15.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.0%).
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Physical Inactivity among Adolescents

Current Value:
16.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (15.3%), Clark has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (16.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.2%).
Prior Value
(18.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Access to Parks

Current Value:

County: Clark Access to Parks

80.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 80.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 68.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value (80.7%), Clark has a value of 80.0% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(80.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (80.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (67.3%).
Prior Value
(67.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Access to Exercise Opportunities

Current Value:
94.7%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 94.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 28.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 94.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (90.6%), Clark has a value of 94.7% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(90.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Clark has a value of 94.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (94.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (96.1%).
Prior Value
(96.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
2.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 2.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 1.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 2.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (2.5%), Clark has a value of 2.5%.
NV Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Clark has a value of 2.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

County: Clark Workers who Walk to Work

Current Value:

County: Clark Workers who Walk to Work

1.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 1.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 2.1%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 1.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (1.5%), Clark has a value of 1.2% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Clark has a value of 1.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Nutrition

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Nutrition

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Fruit Intake among Adolescents

Current Value:
80.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (80.0%), Clark has a value of 80.7% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (80.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (78.5%).
Prior Value
(78.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Vegetable Intake among Adolescents

Current Value:
92.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (91.9%), Clark has a value of 92.3% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(91.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (92.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (95.2%).
Prior Value
(95.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Sugary Drink Intake among Adolescents

Current Value:
13.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (14.0%), Clark has a value of 13.3% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (13.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.4%).
Prior Value
(11.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults Who Eat Vegetables Less than Once Per Day

22.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (24.1%), Clark has a value of 22.7% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(24.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (22.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.1%).
Prior Value
(23.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Adults Who Eat Fruit Less Than Once Per Day

Current Value:
37.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (41.9%), Clark has a value of 37.5% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(41.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (37.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (39.8%).
Prior Value
(39.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Clark Food Insecurity Rate

12.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 12.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (13.0%), Clark has a value of 12.0% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Clark has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (12.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.9%).
Prior Value
(14.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
17.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 17.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 17.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (18.5%), Clark has a value of 17.8% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(18.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.8%), Clark has a value of 17.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (17.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (24.8%).
Prior Value
(24.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Teens who Went Hungry due to Low Food Security

Current Value:
3.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (3.5%), Clark has a value of 3.4% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (3.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.7%).
Prior Value
(3.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark

Obesity

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Obesity

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adults Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Clark Adults Who Are Obese

31.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (31.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.2%).
Prior Value
(29.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults Who Are Overweight

Current Value:
36.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (36.0%), Clark has a value of 36.2% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(36.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (36.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.4%).
Prior Value
(35.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Obese Adolescents

Current Value:

County: Clark Obese Adolescents

16.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (16.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Overweight Adolescents

Current Value:

County: Clark Overweight Adolescents

17.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (17.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.9%).
Prior Value
(15.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adults 20+ with Diabetes

Current Value:

County: Clark Adults 20+ with Diabetes

9.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 9.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 9.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (9.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults Who Have Been Told They Have Prediabetes

17.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (15.6%), Clark has a value of 17.5% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (17.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.1%).
Prior Value
(14.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Adults Who Have Seen a Healthcare Provider for Diabetes

77.7%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (79.0%), Clark has a value of 77.7% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(79.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Adults Who Have Taken a Diabetes Management Class

48.9%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (49.4%), Clark has a value of 48.9% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Adults Who Have Had A-one-C (A1C) Checked

Current Value:
75.7%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (79.3%), Clark has a value of 75.7% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(79.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
13.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 13.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.6%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 13.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.9%), Clark has a value of 13.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark

Cardiovascular Disease

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Cardiovascular Disease

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:
6.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.1%), Clark has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Current Value:
33.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 33.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 33.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (32.7%), Clark has a value of 33.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)

County: Clark Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

75.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 75.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 75.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Clark has a value of 75.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

Current Value:
37.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 37.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.8%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 37.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Clark has a value of 37.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Adults Taking Prescription Cholesterol Medicine

23.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (24.3%), Clark has a value of 23.9% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(24.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Adults Who Have Had a Heart Attack / Myocardial Infarction

3.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (3.8%), Clark has a value of 3.4% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (3.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.7%).
Prior Value
(4.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Current Value:
3.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 3.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.1%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 3.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Clark has a value of 3.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark

Tobacco/Vaping

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Tobacco/Vaping

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adults who Smoke

Current Value:

County: Clark Adults who Smoke

16.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 16.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 16.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Clark has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Clark Adults Who Use Chewing Tobacco

Current Value:
0.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (1.2%), Clark has a value of 0.7% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (0.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.0%).
Prior Value
(1.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults Who Use E-Cigarettes or Other Vaping Products

6.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (7.0%), Clark has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Adult Smoking Cessation

Current Value:

County: Clark Adult Smoking Cessation

42.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (42.3%), Clark has a value of 42.5% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(42.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (42.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (56.5%).
Prior Value
(56.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adolescents Who Currently Smoke Cigarettes

Current Value:
5.4%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (5.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.9%).
Prior Value
(5.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Teens Who Bought Their Own Cigarettes

Current Value:
11.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (9.3%), Clark has a value of 11.3% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(9.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (11.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.9%).
Prior Value
(9.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Teens Who Currently Smoke Cigars

Current Value:
6.2%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (6.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.7%).
Prior Value
(5.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Teens Who Have Ever Used Vaping Products

Current Value:
34.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (36.6%), Clark has a value of 34.3% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(36.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (34.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.5%).
Prior Value
(40.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Teens Who Bought Their Own E-vape Products

Current Value:
1.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (2.3%), Clark has a value of 1.0% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (1.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.7%).
Prior Value
(5.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Teens Who Used an E-vape for Nicotine

Current Value:
12.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (15.0%), Clark has a value of 12.5% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Teens Who Used an E-vape for Marijuana

Current Value:
15.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (16.0%), Clark has a value of 15.7% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.