Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Clark Census Tracts
  • County : Clark Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

County: Clark

Value
Compared to:

Health / Physical Activity

County: Clark

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Access to Exercise Opportunities

Current Value:
94.7%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 94.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 28.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 94.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (90.6%), Clark has a value of 94.7% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(90.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Clark has a value of 94.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (94.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (96.1%).
Prior Value
(96.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Access to Parks

Current Value:

County: Clark Access to Parks

80.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 80.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 68.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value (80.7%), Clark has a value of 80.0% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(80.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (80.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (67.3%).
Prior Value
(67.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Adults Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Clark Adults Who Are Obese

31.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (31.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.2%).
Prior Value
(29.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults Who Are Overweight

Current Value:
36.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (36.0%), Clark has a value of 36.2% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(36.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (36.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.4%).
Prior Value
(35.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Physical Activity among Adolescents

Current Value:
39.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (41.3%), Clark has a value of 39.0% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(41.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (39.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.1%).
Prior Value
(35.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Physical Inactivity among Adolescents

Current Value:
16.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (15.3%), Clark has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (16.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.2%).
Prior Value
(18.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Sedentary Adults 20+

Current Value:

County: Clark Sedentary Adults 20+

24.2%
Percent %
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (24.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.0%).
Prior Value
(27.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education

Current Value:
15.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (15.9%), Clark has a value of 15.1% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (15.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.0%).
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Television Exposure among Adolescents

Current Value:
23.3%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (23.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (30.8%).
Prior Value
(30.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Video/Computer Game Habits

Current Value:
40.2%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (40.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (38.9%).
Prior Value
(38.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Workers who Walk to Work

Current Value:

County: Clark Workers who Walk to Work

1.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 1.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 2.1%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 1.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (1.5%), Clark has a value of 1.2% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Clark has a value of 1.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.